Skip to content
  • A comprehensive comparison of corrosion map analysis performance between DSViewer (DEEPSOUND) and third-party analysis programs.

  • Using the collected Corrosion Map data, the performance of the two analysis programs is compared by examining their respective Colormaps and scan-specific images.

DSViewer Program

  • DSViewer DEEPSOUND Program

Third-Party Program

  • Third-Party Equipment Program

  • Analysis #1 compares the initial defects identified immediately upon loading. By adjusting the data cursor, users can clearly observe the A-scan signal and pinpoint the exact location.

DSViewer Data #1

  • DSViewer Interface

Third-Party Data #1

  • Third-Party Interface

  • Comparison focusing on signal clarity and defect boundary detection.

DSViewer Data #2

  • DSViewer Interface

Third-Party Data #2

  • Third-Party Interface

  • Detailed analysis of thickness variation across the corrosion map.

DSViewer Data #3

  • DSViewer Interface

Third-Party Data #3

  • Third-Party Interface

  • Investigation of specific localized corrosion points.

DSViewer Data #4

  • DSViewer Interface

Third-Party Data #4

  • Third-Party Interface

  • 1. Color Modulation: Both DSViewer and the third-party program effectively accurately adapt their color displays in correspondence to thickness variations.
  • 2. Gate Consistency: The A and B Gates yielded similar results across both systems (as seen in Data #1 through #3).
  • 3. Flaw Detection Discrepancy: For the B-A values in Data #4, a discrepancy in flaw detection was noted between the two programs, highlighting differences in sensitivity or processing.

small-image DSViewer Comparison Summary small-image Third-Party Comparison Summary